JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 26, 2025

A- de 2025

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimir Fernández Andrade

✓Claimant Lasprilla Taborda Jeisson Alberto·Respondent --

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Recurso De Suplica Contra Rechazo Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Finalidad
  • Requisitos de procedencia
  • Incumplimiento de la carga argumentativa
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

La demanda se rechazó por la falta de competencia de la Corte para decidir sobre la constitucionalidad del Acuerdo número 617 de 2018.

Lo anterior, por tratarse de un acto administrativo de carácter general expedido por la Comisión Nacional del Servicio Civil, cuyo control judicial corresponde a la Jurisdicción de lo Contencioso Administrativo.

Consideró la Sala Plena que el actor no presentó razones claras, coherentes y suficientes para demostrar la existencia de un yerro, olvido o arbitrariedad por parte de la Magistrada Sustanciadora al rechazar la demanda por falta de competencia.

En consecuencia, al no cumplir con la carga argumentativa requerida, se RECHAZÓ el recurso impetrado.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR, por falta de carga argumentativa, el recurso de súplica interpuesto por Jeisson Alberto Lasprilla Taborda, en el expediente D-16416, contra del auto del 26 de febrero de 2025.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por intermedio de la Secretaría General,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Vladimir Fernández Andrade
Reporting justice
✓
Cristina Pardo Schlesinger
Magistrado
✓
Diana Constanza Fajardo Rivera
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar
Presidente
✓
José Fernando Reyes Cuartas
Magistrado
✓
Juan Carlos Cortés González
Magistrado
✓
Miguel Efrain Polo Rosero
Magistrado
✓
Natalia Ángel Cabo
Magistrado
✓
Paola Andrea Meneses Mosquera
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.